Decoding Jira Automation: JMWE vs. ScriptRunner Showdown

JMWE vs. ScriptRunner : Jira, a robust project management tool, offers a multitude of features to streamline workflows and boost productivity. Two powerful automation tools, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and ScriptRunner, stand out among the options, each with its unique strengths. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll delve into a detailed comparison of JMWE and ScriptRunner, unraveling their capabilities, differences, and helping you make an informed decision for your Jira automation needs.

Understanding JMWE and ScriptRunner:

Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE):

JMWE is a versatile Jira app designed to extend and enhance Jira’s native functionalities. It provides a range of powerful features to customize workflows, automate repetitive tasks, and improve overall efficiency. From conditional execution to post-functions, JMWE offers a comprehensive set of tools for Jira administrators to tailor their workflows according to their specific requirements.


ScriptRunner, on the other hand, is a Jira app that empowers users to automate and extend Jira’s capabilities through the use of scripted solutions. It supports both Groovy and Jira Query Language (JQL), enabling administrators to create custom scripts for various automation scenarios. ScriptRunner is known for its flexibility and robust scripting capabilities, allowing users to automate complex workflows and manipulate data with ease.

How to link Epic to Initiative in Jira

Comparison Table of  JMWE vs. ScriptRunner :

Feature JMWE ScriptRunner
Workflow Automation Offers a range of post-functions, conditions, validators, and workflow extensions for seamless automation. Provides extensive scripting capabilities using Groovy and JQL, enabling intricate workflow automation.
Scripting Languages Primarily focuses on native Jira expressions and doesn’t require scripting languages. Utilizes Groovy as the primary scripting language, offering advanced scripting capabilities.
Ease of Use User-friendly interface with a visual designer for creating workflow conditions and post-functions. Requires a good understanding of Groovy scripting, which might have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
Pre-built Functions Comes with a variety of pre-built functions that cater to common automation needs. Offers a vast library of built-in scripts for different use cases, reducing the need for custom scripting.
Community Support Has an active community providing support and sharing configurations. Boasts a large and engaged user community, providing extensive support and sharing script snippets.

Choosing between JMWE (Jira Misc Workflow Extensions) and ScriptRunner in Jira depends on your specific needs, expertise, and the complexity of the automation tasks you wish to perform. Here’s a guide to help you decide when to use JMWE vs. ScriptRunner:

Use JMWE When:

  1. User-Friendly Automation: If you are looking for a solution that is more user-friendly and provides a visual interface for designing automation workflows, JMWE is a great choice. It has a straightforward interface that allows users with limited scripting experience to configure conditions and post-functions easily.
  2. Common Workflow Tasks: JMWE is well-suited for handling common workflow tasks and automations. If your requirements align with the pre-built functions and features provided by JMWE, it can be a more efficient choice for quick and straightforward automation needs.
  3. Visual Workflow Design: If you prefer a visual approach to designing workflows and want to avoid extensive scripting, JMWE’s visual designer allows you to create conditions and post-functions with ease.

Use ScriptRunner When:

  1. Advanced Scripting Capabilities: If your automation tasks require advanced scripting using Groovy or if you need to execute complex and custom scripts, ScriptRunner is the tool of choice. It provides a robust scripting environment, making it suitable for intricate automation scenarios.
  2. Extensive Script Library: ScriptRunner comes with a vast library of built-in scripts for various use cases. If your automation needs align with the available scripts, you can leverage them without having to create custom scripts from scratch.
  3. High Customization Requirements: If your automation requirements involve highly customized and specific functionalities that go beyond what pre-built functions can offer, ScriptRunner’s flexibility allows you to tailor your automation workflows to the exact needs of your projects.
  4. Scripted JQL Queries: ScriptRunner allows the use of scripted JQL queries, offering more flexibility in querying and filtering issues based on complex criteria.

Consider Both When:

  1. Hybrid Approach: Some users prefer to use both JMWE and ScriptRunner in their Jira instances, leveraging the strengths of each tool for different purposes. For instance, JMWE may handle simpler tasks, while ScriptRunner is used for more complex scripting needs.
  2. Compatibility: Ensure that the tool you choose is compatible with your Jira version. Both JMWE and ScriptRunner have a history of regular updates to ensure compatibility with the latest Jira releases.
  3. Evaluate Your Team’s Skills: Consider the scripting expertise of your team. If your team is more comfortable with Groovy scripting, ScriptRunner might be a natural fit. Conversely, if your team prefers a more intuitive and visual approach, JMWE might be more suitable.

How to enable initiatives in Jira

External Links:

For additional insights and official documentation, refer to the following external links:

FAQs related to JMWE vs. ScriptRunner :

Q1: Which tool is better for users with limited scripting experience?

A1: JMWE is generally more user-friendly for users with limited scripting experience, offering a visual interface for creating conditions and post-functions.

Q2: Can both tools be used simultaneously in a Jira instance?

A2: Yes, JMWE and ScriptRunner can coexist in a Jira instance, and some users may choose to leverage both for their respective strengths.

Q3: Are there specific use cases where one tool outshines the other?

A3: JMWE is often favored for its simplicity in handling common workflow tasks, while ScriptRunner’s advanced scripting capabilities make it preferable for complex and custom automation scenarios.

Q4: How often are these tools updated with new features and bug fixes?

A4: Both JMWE and ScriptRunner have a track record of regular updates, addressing bug fixes, introducing new features, and ensuring compatibility with the latest Jira versions.


In the dynamic landscape of Jira automation, choosing between JMWE and ScriptRunner depends on your specific needs and expertise. If you prioritize ease of use and pre-built functions, JMWE might be the ideal choice. For users comfortable with scripting and seeking advanced customization, ScriptRunner offers unparalleled flexibility. Consider the unique requirements of your projects, explore the documentation, and tap into the vibrant user communities of both tools to maximize the benefits of Jira automation in your workflow.

Supercharge Your Collaboration: Must-Have Microsoft Teams Plugins Top 7 data management tools Top 9 project management tools Top 10 Software Testing Tools Every QA Professional Should Know 9 KPIs commonly tracked closely in Manufacturing industry